Investment professionals are supposed to give independent advice and judgment. Warren Buffet says, “To be fearful when others are greedy and to be greedy when others are fearful.” Put that into portfolio language and you are talking about rebalancing. For “financial advisors,” one of the most important functions is to encourage clients to rebalance or sell what has gone up and buy what has gone done. According to recent research, “financial advisors” have been unbalancing instead of rebalancing their clients’ accounts. “Advisors” may have actually ended up exposing their clients to more risk rather than less risk. Ever since October, 2007, many “advisors” have been letting clients go into bonds. Those of us that know what may be coming would say “no, don’t do that; you need to go the other way.” But “advisors” are afraid to be strong with their clients. The question to be asked is what might account for this “sheepish behavior?” Sheepish behavior is everybody being like sheep. Why are they so cautious? The “advisors” are afraid to encourage their clients to take more risks by going from bond funds to stock funds, which is what they should be doing.
The second thing the research showed was that “advisors” are feeling, “when clients are strong-headed in one direction and they insist on being that way, just go and do what they want to do. If not, you are going to probably lose a commission.” “Advisors” are afraid to really tell their clients the truth and be strong with them because they are afraid they will lose commissions. Well, those are not “advisors” are they? They are representatives of brokerage firms. They also offer funds but they are still brokerage firms. The public is still seeing their so called “advisor” as an “advisor” instead of a broker. The broker is paid commissions. The “advisor” gets paid for advice. That is the real problem here. We are actually asking the question: Why are so many of these “advisors” afraid to go ahead and set their clients straight? The answer is they are afraid they will lose their commissions. That is what it was all about.
It is important to have a comfort level and your comfort level should be that your “advisor” will advise you properly. If you are working with a fee-based “advisor”, doesn’t he have a fiduciary responsibility to put your interest ahead of his own? That’s right. In this particular case, the fiduciary should be pointing you to rebalancing. The point is to work with a fee-based “advisor” that will recommend rebalancing as appropriate. When things are going the wrong way according to what the “advisor” thinks is right, he needs to tell them, “No! You don’t want to keep going in that way. You are going to get yourself hurt. You need to go ahead and listen to me. I am your “advisor” and I want you to protect you by rebalancing.”
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.
Filed under: wealth management | Leave a Comment »